Skip to content

Construction Superintendent License Qualifications



Rule status: Proposed

Agency: DOB

Comment by date: March 23, 2026

Printable Version of Proposed Rule Text
Proposed-Rule-Amendment-to-Rules-Relating-to-Construction-Superintendent-License-Qualifications.pdf

The Department of Buildings is proposing to amend its rule regarding construction superintendent license qualifications. Article 428 of Chapter 4 of Title 28 of the New York City Administrative Code establishes qualification pathways to become a licensed construction superintendent and authorizes the department to establish additional pathways via rule. These additional pathways are currently found in section 3301-02 of Chapter 3300 of Title 1 of the Rules of the City of New York (RCNY). These proposed amendments would repeal section 3301-02 and add provisions currently found in that section to a new section 104-28 in Subchapter D of Chapter 100 of Title 1 of the RCNY, which deals with licensing and administrative provisions. Requirements from section 3301-02 related to the fees to obtain a construction superintendent license are proposed to be moved to the fee rule, section 101-03 of Title 1 of the RCNY. No change to the fee amounts is proposed.

Send comments by

  • Email: [email protected]
  • Mail: Department of Buildings, 280 Broadway, 7th floor ; New York, New York 10007

Public Hearings

Attendees who need reasonable accommodation for a disability such as a sign language translation should contact the agency by calling 1 (212) 393-2085 or emailing [email protected] by March 9, 2026

Date

March 23, 2026
11:00am - 12:00pm EDT

Connect Virtually
https://events.gcc.teams.microsoft.com/event/07db9632-c48c-45b2-b4bf-f7647432abd3@32f56fc7-5f81-4e22-a95b-15da66513bef
Phone: 646-893-7101

Phone Conference ID: 259636173#

Disability Accommodation
  • Communication Access Real-Time Translation

Comments are now closed.

Online comments: 4

  • Thomas Scanlon

    I am writing to discuss the proposed Rule Amendment to 104-28 regarding Construction Superintendent Qualifications. I believe it is important to consider the inclusion of Safety Management Professionals (SMP) from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals (BCSP) in this amendment. https://tinyurl.com/5x54b4px

    SMP credential holders are highly experienced professionals with job duties that involve the application of essential safety management skills. They possess an up-to-date understanding of safety, health, and environmental concepts and may be tasked with defining and implementing an organization’s safety management systems. Their responsibilities often encompass a variety of areas, including risk management, incident investigation, emergency preparedness, and establishing the business case for safety, among others. BCSP SMP Blueprint

    It is important to note that the SMP credential is equivalent to the Certified Safety Professional (CSP) designation, with the primary distinction being that SMP holders typically may not have a formal degree but bring years of practical experience to the table.

    Inclusion of SMP in the qualifications for Construction Superintendents would not only broaden the pool of qualified candidates but also enhance the safety standards in our industry. I believe this amendment could significantly contribute to improved safety management practices on construction sites.

    Thank you for considering this important addition. I look forward to discussions on how we can move forward with this proposal.
    Thomas Scanlon

    Comment attachment
    SMP-Exam-Blueprint.pdf
    Comment added March 13, 2026 9:24am
  • Robert Ackley

    I am submitting these written comments on behalf of Associated Builders and Contractors.

    Comment attachment
    ABC-Construction-Superintendent-Qualification-Rule.pdf
    Comment added March 20, 2026 1:22pm
  • Joseph Luhrs

    Written testimony submitted on behalf of the Contractors’ Association of Greater New York, Inc. (CAGNY).

    Comment attachment
    2026-Written-Testimony-to-DOB-on-Construction-Superintendent-Licensing-Rules-03.23.2026-4935-1432-2841-v.1.pdf
    Comment added March 20, 2026 5:34pm
  • Building Trades Employers Association, Samuel Eluto

    Below are comments from the Building Trades Employers Association, a document form will also be attached:

    STATEMENT OF THE BTEA TO THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS ON PROPOSED RULE CHANGE
    MARCH 23, 2026
    Good afternoon,

    My name is Samuel Eluto, Director of Member Relations for the Building Trades Employers’ Association (BTEA). The BTEA is made up of more than 1,200 union construction managers, general contractors, and specialty trade subcontractors across New York City. Our members build the subways, schools, hospitals and other critical civil infrastructure projects. Furthermore, on these transformational projects, our contractors set a very high standard for safety. They are proud to be the safest contractors.
    Through SafeBuild, our annual national conference on construction worker safety, and our monthly Safety Committee, which brings together the leaders overseeing New York City’s largest active jobsites, the BTEA has long been a partner to DOB in advancing both safety practices and safety culture. It is from that position of partnership that we submit these comments today.
    After careful review by our Safety Committee, the BTEA has serious concerns about this proposed rule. We believe that in its current form, it will reduce the pool of qualified construction superintendents, disrupt active licensees, and result in less safe jobsites.
    This proposal is most disruptive to construction superintendents whose licenses have lapsed or are approaching expiration and who would normally just reapply and continue working. Under this proposed rules change, many professionals with perfect safety records spanning decades would find themselves unable to renew because their credentials no longer fit the newly narrowed pathway criteria. A licensee with no accidents and a demonstrated record of safe jobsite management should not be treated as unqualified. We strongly urge DOB to establish a grandfather provision for current and recently lapsed licensees, allowing them to renew under the standards by which they were originally licensed.
    More broadly, the experience-based pathways have produced excellent professionals. DOB’s stated rationale is that these pathways are unclear and difficult to quantify, but we find a better solution is clearer documentation standards, not elimination. Similarly, removing the provision that allowed college, technical, or trade school education to substitute for a portion of work experience closes yet another legitimate route into the profession. Rather than contracting the pathway to licensure, we urge DOB to accept a broader range of accreditations and strengthen evidentiary requirements where needed. We would also recommend that DOB consider adding a competency-based examination as an alternative route to licensure.
    Finally, this proposal cannot be considered in isolation. Recent legislation under Local Law 149 of 2021 has already limited construction superintendents to a single primary jobsite designation, with even stricter on-site presence requirements taking effect in 2027, changes that are widely anticipated to increase competition for licensed superintendents and constrain project staffing. It is counterproductive to simultaneously narrow the pathway to obtaining that license.
    To summarize, we urge DOB to retain the experience-based pathways with clearer documentation requirements, establish a grandfather provision for current and recently lapsed licensees, expand rather than narrow the role of education and accreditation, and also to explore a competency examination as an additional pathway. We stand ready to work with DOB to get this right, and we thank the Department for the opportunity to be heard today.

    Comment attachment
    BTEA-DOB-March-23-Testimony.pdf
    Comment added March 23, 2026 9:45am