Proposed City Planning Commission Rules: Affordable Housing Fast Track Methodology
Rule status: Proposed
Agency: DCP
Comment by date: April 1, 2026
Rule Full Text
Proposed-CPC-Rules-Affordable-Housing-Fast-Track-Methodology.pdf
The City Planning Commission proposes rules to establish a methodology to calculate the total number of new affordable dwelling units in each community district, and a methodology to calculate the total number of housing units in each community district at the start of a five-year cycle, for purposes of determining the rate of affordable housing development in each community district during the applicable five-year cycle under Section 197-f of the New York City Charter.
Send comments by
- Email: [email protected]
- Fax: 1 (212) 720-3303
- Mail: City Planning Commission, c/o Calendar Information Office, 120 Broadway, 31st Floor ; New York, New York 10271
Public Hearings
Attendees who need reasonable accommodation for a disability such as a sign language translation should contact the agency by calling 1 (212) 720-3366 or emailing [email protected] by March 18, 2026
Date
April 1, 2026
10:00am - 1:00pm EDT
Location
City Planning Commission Hearing Room
120 Broadway, Lower Level
New York City New York 10271
Connect Virtually
877-853-5247 (US Toll-free), 888-788-0099 (US Toll-free), 253-215-8782 (Toll number) or 213-338-8477 (Toll number)If calling into the meeting, please use the following Meeting ID: 618 237 7396, and when prompted for a participation code, please enter “#” followed by the password “1” when prompted. Details on how to testify by videoconference will be posted on the City Planning Commission Calendar (https://www.nyc.gov/content/planning/pages/calendar) one hour in advance of the hearing.
Disability Accommodation
- Wheelchair Accessible
- Assistive Listening (Telephone)
- Sign Language Interpretation
- Assistive Listening (Ear)
- Closed Captioning
Add a comment
Notes. "Required" indicates a required field. Your email address will not be made public.
Online comments: 1
-
Nancy Idaka Sheran
Comment added March 16, 2026 3:06pmThe proposed methodology is too simplistic. One flaw with this proposed methodology is that it doesn’t take into consideration EXISTING affordable housing in the neighborhood. Many older neighborhoods have existing older buildings with affordable rental units. An unintended consequence of this rule change could be to incentivize developers to tear down existing affordable rental housing in smaller older buildings in order to put up larger buildings with fewer affordable units. The net result is often a LOSS of affordable housing units in the neighborhood. Another unintended consequence could be a net LOSS of housing units (both market and affordable), if larger market-rate apartments replace smaller affordable (rent stabilized) apartments.
A person prone to conspiracy theories would think that this simplistic rule is a NYC developers’ plot to allow for the rapid demolition of older rent-stabilized and rent-controlled buildings, in order to make space for new larger buildings with market rate apartments and perhaps a small number of affordable apartments to comply with government goals.
The correction would be to calculate the total NET (existing + new) affordable housing units, keeping the stats separate, in the neighborhood compared to the total number of housing units in the neighborhood to see if there is a net increase in affordable housing with the zoning changes. It would also be good to separate rental from owned housing units for statistical purposes.
Following each census, report if there is a gain or loss in population in each neighborhood. Pied a Terres and investment properties, where the residency is not full time, and fewer people living in larger apartments will not help the affordable housing crisis.
Capturing this information would provide data for better decision making on whether the zoning and rule changes are actually producing more affordable housing.
Comments close by April 1, 2026