Paid Prenatal Personal Leave
Rule status: Adopted
Agency: DCWP
Effective date: July 2, 2025
Proposed Rule Full Text
DCWP-NOH-Proposed-Rule-Paid-Prenatal-Personal-Leave.pdf
Adopted Rule Full Text
DCWP-NOA-Paid-Prenatal-Personal-Leave-Final.pdf
Adopted rule summary:
Notice of Adoption to add rules related to the Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (“ESSTA”), which was established by Chapter 8 of Title 20 of the New York City Administrative Code.
Comments are now closed.
Online comments: 13
-
Katherine Castellanos
I would like to gain knowledge on this if it is effective as of 1/1/2025
-
Shlomo Mor
Many rules and regulations that keep adding on in NYC increasing the cost of performing Construction and renovation work in NYC it makes it unworthy to stay in the construction business any longer.
Me as many other contractors decided to quit performing any more businesses in the city of New York.
After close to 40 years in business I decided to close my business at the end of this year.
It is unfortunate but the cost of staying in business in the city of New York becomes unbearable. -
GERARDO FAJARDO
THERE IS NOT FAMALE IN THIS CORPORATION BUT A AGREE TO ALL LAW AND RULES NEED IT
-
Michele Lynn Fox
We need paid parental leave in NYC!!
-
NAEEM AKHTAR
Hello
I received this email I am not sure what I have to do can you please direct me what I need to do you can reach me at 518986/1419 -
Dahlia Lopez Ramsay
Essential accommodation for expecting mothers. You must approve any measure that extends paid leave for families expecting and raising newborns.
-
WASEEM Akhtar
New York builder contractor Corp
Comment attachment
License #DCA-2019140
Renew online
New-York-builder-license.pdf -
Elle Bee
It would be helpful to define or further explain “end-of-pregnancy care appointments”, which the law does apply to, as opposed to “post-natal or postpartum appointments”, which the law does not apply to.
-
Ella Gant
Why is NYC proposing rules related to a STATE law? Enforcing the NY Labor Law is the provenance of the NY Dept. of Labor, NOT the DCWP, and the DCWP has no right to impose its own penalties for violation of a state law. This proposal is duplicative and unnecessary, and potentially harmful if city rules contradict the state rules. The state law ALREADY APPLIES to all NYC employers.
The ordinance that the agency is charged with enforcing (ESSTA) does not require prenatal leave, so in essence DCWP is proposing an expansion of city law through regulation and guidance beyond the scope of the law purported to be implemented by these proposed rules. Such action is improper and an abuse of agency discretion. I hate to say it, but that kind of overreach is what inspired the MAGA movement and the creation of DOGE as well as other states’ laws that preempt and forbid local ordinances that contradict or complicate state laws.
If NYC wants to have its own prenatal leave law, then city council should amend the ordinance and persuade the Mayor to sign such an amendment. Until that happens, DCWP should not be implementing such rules.
I would withdraw this proposal in its entirety.
-
Rebekah Cook-Mack
Comment added February 14, 2025 10:49am -
Rebekah Cook-Mack
Comment added February 14, 2025 12:30pm