Paid Prenatal Personal Leave
Rule status: Proposed
Agency: DCWP
Comment by date: February 14, 2025
Rule Full Text
DCWP-NOH-Proposed-Rule-Paid-Prenatal-Personal-Leave.pdf
The Department of Consumer and Worker Protection is proposing to amend rules related to the Earned Safe and Sick Time Act ("ESSTA"). Part M of Chapter 55 of the Laws of 2024 amended section 196-b of the New York State Labor Law by requiring every employer to provide to its employees twenty hours of paid prenatal personal leave during any fifty-two week calendar period. This proposed rule amendment would incorporate the labor law’s paid prenatal personal leave requirements into ESSTA, clarify the penalties and remedies that DCWP may order for violations of such requirements, and provide additional clarification for employers about their compliance obligations.
Attendees who need reasonable accommodation for a disability such as a sign language translation should contact the agency by calling 1 (212) 436-0210 or emailing Rulecomments@dcwp.nyc.gov by February 7, 2025
Send comments by
- Email: Rulecomments@dcwp.nyc.gov
- Mail: DCWP, 42 Broadway ; New York, New York 10004
Public Hearings
Date
February 14, 2025
11:00am - 12:00pm EDT
Location
Connect Virtually
https://tinyurl.com/mr4c4n9tPlease dial +1 646-893-7101
Phone Conference ID: 856 243 484#
Meeting ID: 278 775 240 584
Passcode: Wo7zC7LK
Disability Accommodation
- Sign Language Interpretation
- Open Captioning
- Communication Access Real-Time Translation
Comments are now closed.
Online comments: 13
-
Katherine Castellanos
I would like to gain knowledge on this if it is effective as of 1/1/2025
-
Shlomo Mor
Many rules and regulations that keep adding on in NYC increasing the cost of performing Construction and renovation work in NYC it makes it unworthy to stay in the construction business any longer.
Me as many other contractors decided to quit performing any more businesses in the city of New York.
After close to 40 years in business I decided to close my business at the end of this year.
It is unfortunate but the cost of staying in business in the city of New York becomes unbearable. -
GERARDO FAJARDO
THERE IS NOT FAMALE IN THIS CORPORATION BUT A AGREE TO ALL LAW AND RULES NEED IT
-
Michele Lynn Fox
We need paid parental leave in NYC!!
-
NAEEM AKHTAR
Hello
I received this email I am not sure what I have to do can you please direct me what I need to do you can reach me at 518986/1419 -
Dahlia Lopez Ramsay
Essential accommodation for expecting mothers. You must approve any measure that extends paid leave for families expecting and raising newborns.
-
WASEEM Akhtar
New York builder contractor Corp
Comment attachment
License #DCA-2019140
Renew online
New-York-builder-license.pdf -
Elle Bee
It would be helpful to define or further explain “end-of-pregnancy care appointments”, which the law does apply to, as opposed to “post-natal or postpartum appointments”, which the law does not apply to.
-
Ella Gant
Why is NYC proposing rules related to a STATE law? Enforcing the NY Labor Law is the provenance of the NY Dept. of Labor, NOT the DCWP, and the DCWP has no right to impose its own penalties for violation of a state law. This proposal is duplicative and unnecessary, and potentially harmful if city rules contradict the state rules. The state law ALREADY APPLIES to all NYC employers.
The ordinance that the agency is charged with enforcing (ESSTA) does not require prenatal leave, so in essence DCWP is proposing an expansion of city law through regulation and guidance beyond the scope of the law purported to be implemented by these proposed rules. Such action is improper and an abuse of agency discretion. I hate to say it, but that kind of overreach is what inspired the MAGA movement and the creation of DOGE as well as other states’ laws that preempt and forbid local ordinances that contradict or complicate state laws.
If NYC wants to have its own prenatal leave law, then city council should amend the ordinance and persuade the Mayor to sign such an amendment. Until that happens, DCWP should not be implementing such rules.
I would withdraw this proposal in its entirety.
-
Rebekah Cook-Mack
Comment added February 14, 2025 10:49am -
Rebekah Cook-Mack
Comment added February 14, 2025 12:30pm